China, Korea, Egypt report rise in virus cases as curbs ease

WASHINGTON — How accurate are the coronavirus tests used in the U.S.? Months into the outbreak, no one really knows how well many of the screening tests work, and experts at top medical centers say it is time to do the studies to find out. When the new virus began spreading, the Food and Drug…

China, Korea, Egypt report rise in virus cases as curbs ease

How accurate are the coronavirus tests used in the U.S.?

Months into the outbreak, no one really knows how well many of the screening tests work, and experts at top medical centers say it is time to do the studies to find out.

When the new virus began spreading, the Food and Drug Administration used its emergency powers to OK scores of quickly devised tests, based mainly on a small number of lab studies showing they could successfully detect the virus.

That’s very different from the large patient studies that can take weeks or months, which experts say are needed to provide a true sense of testing accuracy.

The FDA’s speedy response came after it was initially criticized for delaying the launch of new tests during a crisis and after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention stumbled in getting its own test out to states.

But with the U.S. outbreak nearly certain to stretch on for months or even years, some experts want the FDA to demand better evidence of the tests’ accuracy so doctors know how many infections might be missed.

There have been more than 2 million confirmed coronavirus cases in the U.S. and more than 115,000 deaths, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University. Cases in nearly half of U.S. states are rising.

In recent weeks, preliminary findings have flagged potential problems with some COVID-19 tests, including one used daily at the White House. Faulty tests could leave many thousands of Americans with the incorrect assumption that they are virus-free, contributing to new flare-ups of the disease as communities reopen.

“In the beginning, the FDA was under a lot of pressure to get these tests onto the marketplace,” said Dr. Steven Woloshin of Dartmouth College, who wrote about the issue in the New England Journal of Medicine last week. “But now that there are plenty of tests out there, it’s time for them to raise the bar.”

The FDA said in a statement that it has already asked multiple test makers to do follow-up accuracy studies, although it didn’t say for how many of the more than 110 authorized screening tests. The agency also said it is tracking reports of problems. Accuracy has also been an issue with blood tests that look for signs of past infections.

No screening test is 100% accurate. So details on accuracy are routinely provided for tests of all types, including seasonal flu, hepatitis, HIV and cancers. For example, rapid flu tests are known to miss 20% or more of all cases, a factor doctors weigh when treating patients who have symptoms but test negative.

For now, most COVID-19 tests in the U.S. don’t give data on real-world performance, including how often the tests falsely clear patients of infection or falsely detect the virus. That information is lacking for all but a few of the roughly 80 commercial screening tests available, according to an Associated Press review.

The government’s emergency authorization process “requires a lower level of evidence,” the agency said. Makers need only show that a test “may be effective” instead of the usual requirement to demonstrate “safety and effectiveness.” They would have to meet that higher threshold once the U.S. government declares the emergency over.

Many of the commercial test makers submitted results from 60 samples, the minimum number required and mostly used lab-produced specimens of the virus. The FDA now recommends the use of nasal swabs or other real samples from people screened for coronavirus.

Experts say larger patient studies patients are needed to assess a test’s true performance.

Lab testing bears little resemblance to actual — sometimes imperfect — conditions at hospitals, clinics and testing sites noted Dr. Robert Kaplan of Stanford University.

“You’re testing people in parking lots, the patients themselves are extremely anxious and often unable to follow instructions,” said Kaplan, a former associate director of the National Institutes of Health.

Kaplan and others say those differences could explain why some tests are not performing as expected.

Last month, the FDA warned doctors of a potential accuracy problem with Abbott Laboratories’ rapid ID Now test, which delivers results in roughly 15 minutes. The test has been lauded by President donald trump and used to screen the president, his staff and visitors to the White House.

The FDA alert followed a preliminary report by New York University that found Abbott’s test missed between a third to one-half of infections caught by a rival test in patients screened for the virus.

Abbott rejected the findings, saying the researchers did not follow the instructions for using its test. The company pointed to alternate patient studies, including its own, that have found the test successfully detects between 91% and 95% or more of virus cases when compared to other tests.

But similar problems with ID NOW’s accuracy have been flagged in preliminary reports by researchers at Stanford University, Loyola University and the Cleveland Clinic.

For now, the FDA is requiring Abbott to conduct follow-up studies in several different patient groups.

The FDA’s emergency standards “are still high but there is a significant difference in the body of work that what would go into a submission under the normal process,” said Abbott vice president John Hackett. “Our normal process takes years to bring these out.”

Requiring bigger studies of all coronavirus tests could provide valuable information, but it could also strain the FDA’s already stretched staff and resources, said Dr. Daniel Schultz, former director of the FDA’s medical device center.

Dr. Colin West of the Mayo Clinic worries doctors and patients have put too much confidence in the current crop of tests, when an unknown number of patients with COVID-19 are likely receiving false negative results.

Even a modest error rate can have grave consequences during an outbreak like COVID-19. West gives the example of a test that is 95% accurate at detecting the virus and is used on 1 million people. That would still result in 50,000 people being incorrectly told that they don’t have the virus.

“The negative test does not mean that I’m off the hook,” West said. “We just need to maintain that level of vigilance until we have a better sense of how good these tests really can be.”


Follow Matthew Perrone on Twitter: @AP—FDAwriter.


Follow AP pandemic coverage at and


The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

364 thoughts on “China, Korea, Egypt report rise in virus cases as curbs ease”

  1. Pingback: viagra buy
  2. Pingback: viagra for men
  3. Pingback: online viagra
  4. Pingback: viagra dosage
  5. Pingback: buy viagra
  6. Hi there, i read your blog from time to time and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam remarks? If so how do you prevent it, any plugin or anything you can suggest? I get so much lately it’s driving me crazy so any assistance is very much appreciated.

  7. Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The words in your post seem to be running off the screen in Opera. I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you know. The design and style look great though! Hope you get the issue solved soon. Kudos

  8. Pingback: viagra prices
  9. I’m really impressed along with your writing abilities and also with the format on your blog. Is that this a paid theme or did you customize it your self? Anyway stay up the nice high quality writing, it’s rare to look a great blog like this one these days..

  10. Hi there, I found your website by way of Google even as searching for a comparable matter, your website got here up, it looks good. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hi there, simply was alert to your blog thru Google, and located that it’s truly informative. I’m going to be careful for brussels. I will be grateful should you continue this in future. Many people will probably be benefited out of your writing. Cheers!

  11. Howdy would you mind letting me know which web host you’re utilizing? I’ve loaded your blog in 3 completely different internet browsers and I must say this blog loads a lot faster then most. Can you suggest a good web hosting provider at a honest price? Many thanks, I appreciate it!

  12. Pingback: cialis cheap
  13. Hi there! Someone in my Facebook group shared this site with us so I came to take a look. I’m definitely enjoying the information. I’m bookmarking and will be tweeting this to my followers! Exceptional blog and amazing style and design.

  14. Pingback: viagra pills
  15. Pingback: buy cialis online
  16. Pingback:
  17. Hi! I could have sworn I’ve visited your blog before but after looking at a few of the articles I realized it’s new to me. Regardless, I’m certainly pleased I came across it and I’ll be bookmarking it and checking back frequently!

  18. Pingback: viagra online
  19. Pingback: rxtrust pharm
  20. Pingback: generic viagra
  21. My coder is trying to convince me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the costs. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using WordPress on numerous websites for about a year and am nervous about switching to another platform. I have heard fantastic things about Is there a way I can import all my wordpress content into it? Any help would be really appreciated!

  22. Hello there, I found your website by the use of Google while looking for a comparable subject, your website came up, it appears to be like great. I’ve bookmarked it in my google bookmarks.
    Hello there, just was alert to your weblog thru Google, and found that it is really informative. I am gonna be careful for brussels. I’ll appreciate in the event you continue this in future. Many other folks will likely be benefited out of your writing. Cheers!

  23. Pingback: viagra cheap
  24. I’m extremely impressed together with your writing skills as smartly as with the format on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it your self? Either way keep up the excellent quality writing, it’s uncommon to see a great blog like this one today..

  25. I really like what you guys tend to be up too. This type of clever work and reporting! Keep up the fantastic works guys I’ve incorporated you guys to my own blogroll.

  26. Pingback:
  27. Hi there! This article couldn’t be written much better! Reading through this post reminds me of my previous roommate! He continually kept preaching about this. I am going to send this post to him. Fairly certain he’ll have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

  28. Pingback: rx trust pharm
  29. Pingback: cialis vs viagra
  30. Pingback:
  31. Pingback: viagra risks
  32. Pingback: india viagra
  33. Pingback: cialis at walmart

please let me know if you like my content