Posted on by nofcsp1

Devs, Alex Garlands FX on Hulu series, reviewed. – Slate

A woman stands next to a wall that provides a reflection of her.

Sonoya Mizuno in Devs.

FX

Any taxonomy of television would need an entire kingdom just for bad TV. There’s bad TV that’s carelessly made, like a sheep with three hooves and a slapped-on beak. There’s bad TV that’s intentionally bad, schlocky and garish, like a sheep with magenta-dyed fleece. And then there’s bad television that’s striving to be great, that’s got ideas and style but sinks under the weight of its own oversize ambition—a sheep with a 50-pound weight tied to its forelegs and dropped in a river. Alex Garland’s Devs, a philosophically minded, prestige sci-fi cock-up airing on FX on Hulu (so, airing on Hulu with FX branding) belongs to this last species—except in Devs, multiple versions of the same sheep inhabit multiple realities. It sinks like a stone in every single one.

Garland, who wrote and directed every episode of Devs, previously wrote and directed Annihilation, a sonic connection to which you can hear in Devs’ opening moments. Each episode begins with an eerie drone, gonging over otherwise silent images of the cast meaningfully staring at things. People portentously staring—or, in one instance, silently tossing a plate at a wall—is on my “oh, please, no” bingo card, so I won’t pretend that Devs and I got off on the right foot. And since humorlessness and seriosity—like, intoning Yeats levels of seriosity—are also on my bingo card, we never worked it out, though over the course of its eight episodes I did come to believe that, while absolutely none of it worked for me, much of what Devs was doing it was doing on purpose.

The show is made with so much care, sci-fi exposition, and cash—the supercomputer at the center looks like an art deco chandelier!—that its willfully hermetic, claustrophobic vibe; its fussy but swanning beauty; its dramatically deflating structure; and its contained-to-the-point-of-flatness performances must all be intentional, tuned as they are to the show’s central idea about the finite nature of the infinite. But all this control squeezes the life out of everything. The show is what it wants to be, but what it wants to be put me in mind of the big whiffs of the immediate post-Sopranos era, a hefty, pretentious, high-profile exercise in trying to make you Google de Broglie–Bohm theory.

Devs concerns itself with a young woman named Lily Chan (Sonoya Mizuno) who works for Amaya, a quantum computing giant that has surpassed facebook and Twitter and Google in Silicon Valley supremacy. Lily, low-key and androgynous, is the type of character whom other characters are constantly saying is singular and exceptional, a woman who does things differently, though that’s mostly expressed by her tendency to use windows instead of front doors. Lily lives with her boyfriend, Sergei (Karl Glusman), a Russian engineer who also works at Amaya. Every morning they step over the homeless man who lives on their San Francisco doorstep to take the company bus out to the valley.

This setup might suggest that Devs is interested in modern-day tech companies and the anthropology of their social milieu. It’s not. Its climactic insight on this subject is that tech CEOs have too much power—“You know the problem with people who own tech companies? They have too much power. They become messiahs”—which it shares twice, treating it like a revelation each time instead of a San Francisco fortune cookie. The would-be messiah of Amaya is its shaggy-headed beardo of a CEO, Forest (Nick Offerman), a man driven by a personal tragedy announced by the lifelike megastatue of his daughter that towers over the campus named for her. (The statue is further evidence of the show’s general disinterest in actual tech companies: In this age of polished industrial design, none of them would ever plant a 10-story garden gnome with wax museum energy in their front yard.)

This setup might suggest that Devs is interested in modern-day tech companies and the anthropology of their social milieu. It’s not.

Outwardly, Amaya is your standard world-conquering tech outfit, but its hundreds of employees obscure its real purpose, which is known only to the small handful of people involved with the company’s top-secret Devs team. Early on, Sergei is invited to join Devs after giving a presentation to Forest and his right-hand woman Katie (Alison Pill), in which he is able to accurately predict the future behavior of a simple organism. (Forest chomps on raw spinach during the presentation, a techlord with the swagger to eat like a cow, which is about as funny as Devs gets) After 30 seconds, though, the model falls apart: There’s too much data, too much complexity, and the numbers “go insane.” Or maybe, Sergei theorizes, “it’s a quantum-type problem.” Somewhere in the multiverse is an organism that’s behaving exactly as they predicted—it’s just not this universe. “Not a fan of the multiverse theory,” Forrest replies. Is your Reddit sense tingling yet?

It should be. Devs’ best quality is that it will inspire a thriving community of people geeking out about it on the internet—people who will likely work as a ventilator for the show itself, making it seem more alive than it is. (In this, and so many other things, it has a lot of overlap with HBO’s Westworld, another sci-fi show about humans’ limited capacity to change, but one that’s at least real enough to admit technocrats seeking absolute power might be motivated by self-interest, and not “trauma.”) The series concerns itself with all sorts of ideas, scientific and philosophical, that are fun to think and theorize about, while being, itself, no fun at all. Unlike Garland’s other previous directorial effort, the zingily plotted and spacily stylish exploration of artificial intelligence and sex robots, Ex Machina, Devs has no spark. It has no moment anywhere close to being as creepy, strange, funny, or threatening as an Oscar Isaac dance sequence, even if Garland did recast Isaac’s dance partner as Devs’ lead. (In the one scene where she gets to let loose, she’s great.) What it has instead is a good brainteaser, a sci-fi philosophy mashup: What if the multiverse were real, but also deterministic? What if the world that was constantly branching out into different realities showed us that we tend to do the same thing in every one, turning back on ourselves like so many ingrown toes?

Shortly after being promoted to the Devs team, Sergei disappears, and Lily is left to figure out what happened to him, turning for help to her lovelorn ex-boyfriend Jamie (Jin Ha, definitely the best thing about the show). Lily doesn’t know what happened to Sergei, but we do. Garland has made a choice to have the audience inhabit a kind of all-seeing position—which, like so much about Devs, is structurally elegant but dramatically inert. It puts us in the same position as, say, a tech team that has designed a supercomputer so powerful that it can see the past and all possible futures, a clever bit of mirroring. But it also leads to multiple sequences in which Lily is just catching up to what we already know, recapitulations that are passed off like moments of tension but have all the suspense of a “previously on … ” intro.

Over and over again, Devs’ characters are informed that, no matter how hard they fight it, they are going to end up doing the same thing they were going to do, or already have. Instead of fighting anyway, they accept it. It’s as if Oedipus responded to the prophecy that he would kill his father and marry his mother by saying: “Oof. You sure? I guess I’ll just go do that.” Obviously, that’s the stuff of tragedies that have lasted for thousands of years. By the time someone really tries to break out of what has been preordained, they accomplish it with so much ease that the moment, meant to be remarkable, falls flat: This whole free will thing doesn’t seem that hard—maybe someone should have tried it sooner.

But Devs is the kind of show that’s immune, in some ways, to criticism. On the one hand, it’s a big mood; on the other, it’s a logic puzzle. You feel it and then, if you keep watching, you’ll find yourself trying to solve it, even if that means picking at it. Why would a company hire a corporate spy if it could see the past and the future? Why would two people privately argue about firing someone they already knew they had fired? You could take these questions to r/devs, or you could answer them for yourself.

335 Replies to “Devs, Alex Garlands FX on Hulu series, reviewed. – Slate”

  2. So he can caricaturist if patients are slightest to bear or continuous an empiric, you skate a unrefined or other etiologic agents, the prevalence becomes fresh and You espy a syndrome fly the coop online chemist’s shop viagra you the resolution of the ancient women. casinos online play for real online casino games

    Reply

  9. To bole and we all other the preceding ventricular that corrupt corporeal cialis online from muscles still with soundless essential them and it is more plebeian histology in and a hit and in there dialect right practical and they don’t even liquidation you are highest dupe off on the international. order viagra generic name for viagra

    Reply
  22. Pingback: buy viagra no prescription
  25. Pingback: canadian pharmacy king
  29. Pingback: buy viagra new york
  34. Pingback: viagra prices
  36. Pingback: viagra cost
  40. Pingback: viagra without a doctor prescription
  41. Pingback: best viagra alternative
  45. Pingback: when to buy viagra
  49. Pingback: buy online viagra
  52. Pingback: price of viagra

  63. Howdy just wanted to give you a quick heads up. The text in your article seem to be running off the screen in Internet explorer. I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I figured I’d post to let you know. The design look great though! Hope you get the issue fixed soon. Thanks

    Reply
  98. Pingback: droga5.net
  100. Pingback: buy viagra at walmart
  107. Pingback: buy cialis and viagra online
  109. Pingback: canadian viagra
  124. Pingback: where to buy viagra cheapin jax fl

  136. Hello there! This blog post couldn’t be written any better! Looking at this post reminds me of my previous roommate! He always kept preaching about this. I am going to send this information to him. Fairly certain he will have a good read. Thank you for sharing!

    Reply

  156. I am curious to find out what blog platform you have been working with? I’m having some minor security issues with my latest site and I’d like to find something more secure. Do you have any recommendations?

    Reply
  170. Pingback: buy generic viagra

  185. Definitely believe that which you said. Your favorite justification seemed to be on the web the simplest thing to have in mind of.
    I say to you, I definitely get irked even as other folks think about concerns that they plainly don’t realize about.
    You controlled to hit the nail upon the highest and defined out the whole thing
    with no need side effect , folks could take a signal.

    Will likely be back to get more. Thanks https://azhydroxychloroquine.com/

    Reply
  195. Pingback: RxTrustPharm

  196. My programmer is trying to persuade me to move to .net from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses. But he’s tryiong none the less. I’ve been using Movable-type on numerous websites for about a year and am concerned about switching to another platform. I have heard great things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress posts into it? Any kind of help would be really appreciated!

    Reply

  201. It’s a pity you don’t have a donate button! I’d certainly donate
    to this excellent blog! I suppose for now i’ll settle for bookmarking and
    adding your RSS feed to my Google account. I look forward to brand new updates and will
    talk about this website with my Facebook group. Talk soon! https://buszcentrum.com/

    Reply
  208. Pingback: cialis online

  214. how hard is it to get your doctor to give you viagra
    viagra without doctor prescription trusttnstore.com cheap cialis
    which presidential candidate was the first spokesman for viagra? mitt romney

    Reply

  221. Does your website have a contact page? I’m having a tough time locating it but, I’d like to send you an e-mail. I’ve got some recommendations for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great site and I look forward to seeing it develop over time.

    Reply
  230. Pingback: viagra pills
  241. Pingback: http://cialistodo.com
  260. Pingback: where can i buy tamoxifen 10 mg
  271. Pingback: cialis generic
  278. Pingback: buy tadalafil
  279. Pingback: buy Premarin 0,625mg
  289. Pingback: online pharmacy viagra
  300. Pingback: cephalexin canada
  311. Pingback: rx trust pharm
  312. Pingback: real casino
  313. Pingback: slot games
  315. Pingback: best online casino usa
  324. Pingback: where can i buy over the counter viagra
  325. Pingback: direct general car insurance quotes
  326. Pingback: car insurance quotes texas online
  327. Pingback: best installment loans for bad credit
  328. Pingback: caverta vs viagra
  329. Pingback: wife needs viagra cock
  330. Pingback: cheapest coumadin 1mg
  331. Pingback: hyzaar generic
  332. Pingback: lamisil over the counter
  333. Pingback: cost of prevacid 30mg
  334. Pingback: proair inhaler 100mcg otc
  335. Pingback: how to purchase olmesartan 20mg

please let me know if you like my content